The author presents a balanced perspective on dietary debates, specifically criticizing the divisive nature of the upcoming “Meat vs EAT-Lancet” report. They emphasize the importance of inclusive dialogue regarding nutrition, advocating for a space where both plant and animal-based diets are respected. While acknowledging the rise of plant-based advocacy, the author argues against vilifying scientists who challenge mainstream narratives. The discussion highlights the need for evidence-based critiques over social media conjecture, reinforcing that genuine scientific inquiry should welcome debate without resorting to shaming or labeling those who question prevailing ideologies. Peaceful coexistence at the dinner table is championed.