I offer a Thoughtful Perspective on Benefits, Concerns, and the Road Ahead Based on a Literature Review & Personal Insights.
Why I Say “No” to Lab-Grown Steak At This Stage Yet Remain Open-Minded as a Scientist and Technologist Considering Pros and Cons Transparently
I used to passionately avoid animal products in my younger years, but I have come to appreciate and love them in my older years for compelling reasons. This unique journey, with its ups and downs, allows me to relate to both ends of the spectrum with empathy and compassion.
Lab-grown meat (cultured or cultivated meat) has sparked skepticism and a mix of emotions like excitement and disgust. It is now a hot debate in the United States political agenda as part of the new Trump administration, which has been delegated to Mr Kennedy Jr.
The idea of producing meat without farming animals seems compelling and even revolutionary in theory. However, as with any new technology and scientific idea, there are complexities and unanswered questions that I want to articulate in this post independently from multiple angles.
In this story, I first introduce it based on my research, provide my personal approach to it, and give unique perspectives based on my literature review, including the growing scientific research and discussions in the media.
Lab-grown meat involves engineering and designing animal cells in a controlled setting to produce meat products. Instead of raising and slaughtering animals, scientists, technologists, and engineers replicate the growth of animal tissues using nutrient-rich mediums leveraging ideas from nutrition science.
At first glance, it seems like an ideal solution to our modern societal problems, such as reducing the environmental toll of farming, sparing animals, and feeding a growing population in some parts of the world dealing with starvation.
Decades of accumulated knowledge in cell culture, stem cell biology, bioprocess engineering, and biotechnology have made this innovation possible. Like every innovation, it brings ethical and cultural challenges.
Cultivated meat synthetically aims to replicate the sensory and nutritional profiles of conventional meat by growing skeletal muscle, fat, and connective tissues. Many people ask, “But is it truly the future of meat?”
First, let me share my personal thoughts to explain the concepts better and open a healthy dialogue on this hot topic, which is now on the political agenda in the United States.
Why I Say “No” to Lab-Grown Steak Initially
Although influential and wealthy people like Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, and Richard Branson advocate for lab-grown meat as a symbol of sustainable nutrition, my approach is different as a caution from multiple angles.
As someone who appreciates natural meat, it goes beyond sustenance for me. Meat is a deeply rooted connection to culture, traditions, and shared experiences with family and friends. From the ritual of a Sunday barbecue with family to the joy of a celebratory dinner, meat represents life’s cherished moments and memories.
Lab-grown meat challenges this connection. It raises concerns and questions that extend beyond its scientific, technological, and engineering feasibility. Many of my collaborators ask, “Can it ever truly replace the cultural and emotional significance of traditional meat? “
For many, including myself, this transition feels like a step away from the natural world and the heritage that has defined our diets for generations throughout human history.
I recognize the potential benefits of lab-grown meat in theory, such as its ethical and environmental promises, but I am concerned about broader implications. The key question coming to my mind “Is it possible to engineer the essence of what makes meat so integral to our lives?”
My question goes beyond the taste or texture point of view. It prompts preserving a connection that has shaped humanity’s relationship with food and nature. Let me outline the key points of my concern transparently and in simple language.
1. Psychological Concerns: Is It Really Meat?
Even though lab-grown meat is genetically identical to animal meat, it feels fundamentally different. Food connects us to nature. Replacing farm-raised animals with bioreactors severs that bond. Research highlights a naturalness bias, where humans instinctively distrust food perceived as artificial. While lab-grown meat might be scientifically sound, the psychological disconnect remains significant.
2. Health Concerns: What Are We Really Eating?
Although proponents assure us of its safety, lab-grown meat is new, and our knowledge of risks is limited. The complex processes used to cultivate it — cell manipulation, synthetic growth media, and scaffolding techniques raise questions about potential long-term health impacts. I remain skeptical of consuming something so experimental when our bodies’ reactions are unknown. Additionally, concerns about the potential presence of carcinogenic properties in cell linings warrant further investigation.
3. Environmental Promises: Not So Clear-Cut
While lab-grown meat touts reduced greenhouse gas emissions and land use, its energy demands are significant. Bioreactors require specific conditions that consume electricity. Without green energy sources, lab-grown meat’s environmental benefits could be offset by its carbon footprint. A paper in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems suggests that lab-grown meat may emit more CO2 in the long run if energy sources are not renewable.
4. Economic and Social Concerns
Lab-grown meat is currently expensive and inaccessible to most people. It can be purchased only by very wealthy people. Even as production costs decrease, it risks dividing between those who can afford high-tech food and those who rely on traditional, locally sourced meat. Moreover, livestock farming is tied to livelihoods and cultural traditions. Who benefits from this food revolution, and at what cost?
5. Ethical Concerns: Playing with Nature
In my opinion, just because we can grow meat in labs with our engineering power does not mean we should. Humanity’s history of tinkering with nature — from genetically modified crops to plastics — reminds us of the unintended consequences of progress. While lab-grown meat reduces animal suffering on the surface, it risks turning food into something mechanical and soulless, which does not align with human evolution.
6. Regulatory Hurdles: A Complex Approval Process
Lab-grown meat faces significant regulatory challenges before it can be widely available to consumers. Countries vary in their approach to approving new food technologies, and the rigorous testing required for safety and quality assurance adds complexity. For instance, Singapore has taken the lead in approving lab-grown chicken, but other nations remain cautious. These differences create a fragmented landscape, potentially delaying global adoption. Navigating these regulatory frameworks will require transparency, collaboration, and scientific rigor to build consumer trust.
7. Nutritional Concerns: What About the Nutrients?
One significant concern surrounding lab-grown meat is its nutritional quality. While traditional meat is not only a source of protein but also an essential provider of key micronutrients like iron, zinc, vitamin B12, vitamin D, and vitamin K2, lab-grown meat may fall short.
Another critical aspect is the balance of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, which play a vital role in heart and brain health. The fatty acid profile in lab-grown meat depends largely on the type of cells used and the nutrients provided in the medium. It may not match the composition found in conventionally raised meat, potentially affecting its health benefits.
The nutrient composition of cultivated meat depends on the growth medium, which might not fully replicate the complex natural biological environment of living animals. This discrepancy could result in notable differences in the levels of these essential nutrients.
My Perspectives After Conducting a Comprehensive Literature Review from Multiple Angles
1 — A Nutritional Biochemistry Perspective
Rather than diets, I focus on nutritional biochemistry, which can make our arguments easier as diet is an emotional and personal matter. From a nutritional biochemistry standpoint, lab-grown meat presents opportunities and challenges.
Traditional meat’s nutritional value stems from its complex composition of macronutrients, micronutrients, and bioactive compounds that result from the animal’s diet, metabolism, and living environment. Cultivated meat, however, lacks these natural metabolic processes.
One notable gap is the absence of heme iron, a highly bioavailable form of iron found in traditional meat. This compound contributes to iron intake and influences meat’s characteristic flavor and color.
Lab-grown meat’s nutrient profile also depends entirely on the synthetic growth medium. While this allows for the potential enhancement of certain nutrients, such as lowering saturated fats or fortifying with omega-3 fatty acids, it also risks an imbalance or oversimplification of the nutritional composition.
Another concern is the biochemical impact of the cell culture process itself. Rapid cell growth may result in altered cellular structures, potentially affecting human digestibility or metabolic response. For instance, modifications to protein structures during cell multiplication could lead to unforeseen digestive or allergenic reactions.
Finally, the role of bioactive peptides, naturally formed in traditional meat during an animal’s life cycle, remains unclear in lab-grown meat.
These peptides are vital in human health, influencing blood pressure regulation, immune responses, and antioxidant activity. Without a clear understanding of how these compounds form in cultivated meat, there may be gaps in its potential health benefits.
2 — A Cultural and Anthropological Perspective
To fully understand the significance of meat in human diets, we must consider its role in our evolutionary history.
Anthropological studies suggest that consuming animal products, particularly animal fat, was a prominent factor in developing the human brain. The dense caloric and nutrient content of meat provided the energy needed to fuel our ancestors’ growing brains, contributing to the evolution of Homo sapiens as highly intelligent beings.
The genetic adaptations of humans also reflect a long history of meat consumption. Digestive enzymes like proteases, pepsin, and lipase evolved to optimize the digestion of proteins and fats, highlighting how deeply intertwined animal products are with our physiology.
This evolutionary connection depicts meat’s cultural and psychological importance, extending beyond its nutritional value to include traditions, rituals, and communal experiences.
Lab-grown meat, as a technological marvel, cannot replicate the cultural and anthropological depth associated with traditional meat.
For many cultures, meat is a symbol of celebration, identity, and survival. It is part of ceremonies, family gatherings, and historical narratives that connect us to our past. Replacing it with a laboratory product risks severing these profound cultural ties, making the adoption of lab-grown meat not just a dietary shift but a cultural one.
3 — Potential Health Risks: Safe or Uncertain?
The safety of lab-grown meat is another area of concern. Although production occurs in controlled environments designed to minimize contamination, the process is not immune to risks.
Contaminants could infiltrate during cell cultivation or through the growth medium itself. Furthermore, lab-grown meat is new, and its long-term health effects remain uncertain.
Early studies suggest potential issues with rapid cell multiplication, which could lead to dysregulation or metabolic abnormalities in the cells, raising questions about unforeseen impacts on human health.
4 — Ethical Considerations: A New Dilemma
Lab-grown meat introduces new ethical challenges even as it eliminates the need to slaughter animals.
While the technology reduces direct harm, the initial collection of animal cells often involves live animals. This raises concerns about whether the process is entirely cruelty-free.
Moreover, many consumers view lab-grown meat as “unnatural,” a perception that could hinder its acceptance despite scientific validation.
5 — Environmental Impact: A Mixed Picture
The environmental benefits of lab-grown meat are highlighted, but the picture is complex. Producing lab-grown meat requires significant energy to maintain controlled conditions. If the energy used is not from renewable sources, the environmental advantages may diminish.
However, studies suggest that if renewable energy is used, greenhouse gas emissions could decrease by up to 96%, and land use could shrink by as much as 99% compared to traditional beef production.
Additionally, the process generates waste, such as spent growth media and other materials. Effective waste management is essential to ensure that the sustainability claims hold true.
6 — Economic Viability: Can It Compete?
Currently, lab-grown meat is significantly more expensive to produce than traditional meat. Reducing production costs and scaling up operations to industrial levels remain substantial challenges.
Developing optimized growth media and creating new cell lines are critical steps needed to make this technology affordable and practical for widespread use.
Until these barriers are addressed, the economic feasibility of lab-grown meat will remain a significant concern.
7 — Personal Perspective: Insights from a Keto-Carnivore Experience
I used to be a strict vegan in my younger years due to ethical concerns, which made me unhealthy and unhappy, so I had to change my diet. My years of practicing a keto-carnivore diet have provided me with unique insights into the profound role animal-based nutrition plays in metabolic and mental health.
This dietary approach, consuming more healthy fats and moderate protein from bioavailable animal products, improves the body’s natural ability to enter ketosis. It is a metabolic state. Fat becomes the primary energy source. I explained the biochemistry of ketosis in a previous article.
Keto-carnivore made my body fat-adapted and insulin-sensitive. It allowed me to perform periodic fasting for up to ten days multiple times annually. Currently, I am performing one to celebrate my new year on an empty stomach for more empathy and compassion.
The keto-carnivore diet has improved my health, enhancing my hormonal balance, mental clarity, and physical energy. It helped me to reverse my pre-diabetes, recover from abdominal obesity, and even helped me gain six-pack abs in my 50s and get rid of loose skin.
By focusing on nutrient-dense foods such as fatty meat and organ meats, I have addressed deficiencies that gave me nightmares during my younger years in plant-based diets.
This approach aligns with evolutionary patterns, as anthropological studies show our ancestors thrived on similar diets during periods of scarcity.
Moreover, the simplicity of the keto-carnivore diet has improved my quality of life. Without the complexities of plant-based eating, I have established a lifestyle that supports my well-being and minimizes the risk of major diseases.
While this diet may not suit everyone’s needs and desires, its impact on my metabolic and mental health supports the importance of personalized nutrition and the value of animal products in human evolution.
Conclusions and Takeaways: The Way Forward
Lab-grown meat is a work in progress. I appreciate the efforts of scientists to improve its nutritional quality, safety, and efficiency.
However, I believe we can explore other sustainable options, such as regenerative agriculture and improved farming practices. Reducing meat consumption and choosing ethically raised meat are practical steps we can take today without fully severing our connection to nature.
Advances in renewable energy, scalability, and collaborative efforts from life science companies are critical to making lab-grown meat a more viable option. Meanwhile, regulatory approvals and public education will shape its acceptance and future role in our diets.
Lab-grown meat represents an innovative yet complex solution to global challenges. While it offers promise, it also raises valid concerns about health, ethics, and environmental impact.
As someone who values the deep connections between food, culture, and nature, I currently find it difficult to embrace this technology wholeheartedly. My thoughts might change over the years as I keep an open mind to scientific and technological innovations within ethical boundaries like anything else.
For now, I choose to stick with real meat, be mindful of its impact, and explore ways to make traditional farming more sustainable. Lab-grown meat may be the future for some, but for me, it is a resounding “no” at this stage. I invite you to continue the dialogue and critically examine this technology as it evolves.
I respect all diets and have deep empathy and compassion for herbivores, omnivores, and carnivores. I want everyone to follow their hearts and stay healthy and happy. I see diet as a personal matter, not a matter of ethics but health.
To start a healthy dialogue on this issue, I leave you with three questions you may share in the comments section of this story.
1 — How do you think lab-grown meat could impact food’s cultural and emotional significance, such as family traditions and personal memories tied to shared meals?
2 — Given lab-grown meat’s unknown long-term health effects, what precautions or assurances would make you feel more confident about adding it to your diet?
3 — In the quest to reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, do you think lab-grown meat offers the right balance, or are there alternative approaches that could address these challenges more effectively?
There are no right or wrong answers, just different perspectives.
I created a comprehensive and interactive podcast using the Google Notebook technology to help you understand the issue with pros and cons from multiple angles.
Here is also a new tweet that you may share your thoughts. 9000+ people have already participated in this tweet, and hundreds of such posts are on social media.
Prominent Reference: The science of cultivated meat by Good Food Institute
I invite you to join my 2025 writing prompt. The pain I felt a few days ago is so tiny compared to the pain of innocent children suffering from hunger and diseases due to poverty.
How Will I Support Child Sponsorship in 2025 and How You Can Contribute as a Writer and Reader, Too
Join me to make a ripple effect in the New Year.medium.com
During your journey in 2025, I invite you to go outside of your comfort zone, mainly work in a stretch zone, and take calculated risks for success and joy, as I explained in a story many readers love.
Thank you for subscribing to my content and allowing me to amplify your stories in my circles. Let’s make our writing and reading community more vibrant in 2025 with wonderful stories and meaningful engagement.
You can join my newsletters, where I offer experience-based content on health, content strategy, and technology topics to inform and inspire my readers.
Get an email whenever Dr Mehmet Yildiz publishes. He is a top writer and editor on Medium.
Leave a Reply